Only one problem: There IS no censorship.
Censorship is when the government stops you from showing a work of art. Nobody’s banning the display of this goofy video, the artist isn’t going to be arrested, and nobody’s going to get busted for showing it. The only thing that has happened is that some people who PAY for government art displays—i.e. “taxpayers”—have objected to being forced to pay to display something that offends them.
You know, like when some whiner goes to Town Council and objects to a Christmas Tree in a public park?
If a group of Christians said that every town refusing to pay for a creche was “censoring” Christmas, they’d be laughed out of the manger.
What’s the difference?
"The truth is something [Warren] probably prefers not to confront. Harvard doesn’t come calling just because you’re a smart lawyer and a terrific teacher — not with Warren’s modest, Oklahoma upbringing and non-Ivy League education. She is not your typical Harvard professor. At a certain point, when the law school was under pressure to promote diversity, she represented a three-fer: a great lawyer with a national profile, a woman, and a minority, at least by virtue of family lore. "
-- Joan Vennochi
